James A. Piatt - Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC
Indiana Law Firm
James is a principal member of Riley Williams & Piatt, LLC. His practice focuses on business litigation and class action and mass tort litigation. James was named an Indiana Super Lawyers’ Rising Star in the area of business litigation in 2012, 2013 and 2014. As a business litigator, James has successfully represented clients ranging from a private equity group, to a charter fishing business, to a medical device sales representative sued by his former employer. In the mass tort arena, James prepared a bellwether case for trial in the Yaz/Yasmin (Bayer Pharmaceuticals) litigation and the case was ultimately settled.
Awards, Distinctions & Honors
- Best Lawyers, 2018
- Indiana Super Lawyers’ Rising Stars (2012-2014);
- Order of the Barristers, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law
- Note Development Editor, Indiana Law Review
- Notre Dame Scholar Academic Scholarship Recipient
James graduated cum laude from the University of Notre Dame in 1999 and from Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law in 2009. He is a member of the Indiana State Bar Association and the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association. During law school, James was inducted into the Order of the Barristers and served as Note Development Editor for the Indiana Law Review. Prior to and during law school, James worked in professional sports.
In May and June of 2011, James examined and cross-examined the majority of witnesses during a 6-week jury trial, which resulted in a $14.5 million verdict for the client. (State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Joseph Martin Radcliff and Coastal Property Management LLC, a/k/a CPM Construction of Indiana, Hamilton County Superior Court, No. 29D01-0810-CT-1281).
Speaking Engagements
- ITLA Annual Institute
Memberships & Associations
- Indiana Bar Association
- Indiana Trial Lawyers Association
- Immaculate Heart of Mary parish
- International Society of Primerus Law Firms
- Notre Dame Club of Indianapolis
On May 4, 2012, James gave the closing argument in Daniel E. Sparks v. Vincennes University, Knox County Superior Court, No. 42D01-0705-PL-022 - the Knox County jury awarded former VU head basketball coach Dan Sparks $230,000 for his breach of contract claim against Vincennes University.
On February 25, 2013, James achieved summary judgment in the amount of $935,005.61 on behalf of a private equity client for fraud claims against a promoter (WDC Capital v. Damean Clinton, Hamilton County Superior Court, No. 19C01-1109-CT-09440).
Related listings
-
In Veterans Court, former service members fight new battle
Elite Lawyers 08/22/2018Sheriff's deputies steered three handcuffed men into Veterans Court one day this summer. The backs of their red jumpsuits read "Allegheny County Jail." One prisoner had doe eyes and long hair, resembling pictures of Christ.He wore shackles around his...
-
Steve Mostyn, Houston attorney and major Dem donor, dies
Elite Lawyers 11/18/2017Steve Mostyn, a prominent Houston trial attorney and a top Democratic Party donor, has died. He was 46.In a statement, his family confirmed Thursday his death on Wednesday "after a sudden onset and battle with a mental health issue.""Steve was a belo...
-
Top German court strengthens intersex identity rights
Elite Lawyers 11/06/2017Germany’s highest court has decided that people must be allowed to be entered in official records as neither male nor female, saying in a ruling published Wednesday that authorities should create a third identity or scrap gender entries altoget...
USCIS to Begin Accepting Applications under the International Entrepreneur Rule
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today it is taking steps to implement the International Entrepreneur Rule (IER), in accordance with a recent court decision.
Although the IER was published during the previous administration with an effective date of July 17, 2017, it did not take effect because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule on July 11, 2017, delaying the IER’s effective date until March 14, 2018. This delay rule was meant to give USCIS time to review the IER and, if necessary, to issue a rule proposing to remove the IER program regulations.
However, a Dec. 1, 2017, ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in National Venture Capital Association v. Duke vacated USCIS’ final rule to delay the effective date. The Dec. 1, 2017, court decision is a result of litigation filed in district court on Sept. 19, 2017, which challenged the delay rule.