California voters reject measure to tax the wealth of billionaires
Supreme Court News
California voters have turned down Proposition 40, which would have made the state the first in the nation to tax the net worth of billionaires, after a bitter ballot campaign that drew enormous spending from tech leaders determined to block the tax.
The Associated Press determined Monday that the "no" side had secured enough votes to win. Because most Californians vote by mail and ballots postmarked by Election Day are counted if they arrive within a week, close contests in the state often take days or weeks to resolve.
What the measure would have done
Proposition 40 would have imposed a one-time 5% tax on the wealth of California residents worth more than $1 billion. Most of the revenue was earmarked to offset federal cuts to healthcare funding, with 10% directed to education and food-assistance programs. SEIU United Healthcare Workers West, the union behind the measure, argued the money was needed to make up for an estimated $100 billion in federal healthcare funding the state is expected to lose over five years.
The proposal was the most significant test so far of a long-standing progressive goal: taxing the ultra-rich on their investment holdings, the main source of their wealth, rather than on wages from work.
A lopsided money fight
Opponents outraised supporters by roughly 10 to 1. Building a Better California, a political action committee funded largely by billionaires, raised more than $333 million to defeat the tax and also backed rival ballot measures designed to cancel it out. Google co-founder Sergey Brin alone contributed more than $100 million, close to a third of the committee's total.
The defeat is also a victory for Democratic leaders who opposed the tax, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, a possible 2028 presidential candidate. Critics warned that the measure would have driven ultrawealthy residents out of California.
Supporters plan another attempt
The measure drew backing from progressive figures outside California, including Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who held rallies across the state in the final weeks of the campaign.
The Yes on 40 campaign said its goal was to protect healthcare for Californians and pledged to return with a tax measure in 2028 if patients are not protected. In a statement Monday, proponents said that buying an election is not the same as winning the debate, and called the result only the first round of the fight.
Related listings
-
Justice Department drops bid to force California to set aside disputed ballots
Supreme Court News 11/08/2026The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal court to dismiss its own lawsuit seeking to stop California from counting about 20,000 ballots that the department claimed were sent to noncitizens, until the voters' immigration status could b...
-
Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong sentenced to 10 more years in prison
Supreme Court News 11/05/2026A Hong Kong court on Thursday handed prominent pro-democracy activist Joshua Wong an additional 10-year prison term under the national security law imposed by Beijing, a ruling critics say reflects the sweeping crackdown on the city's once-vibrant de...
-
Judge orders 30-year prison sentence for key figure in Minnesota food fraud
Supreme Court News 11/01/2026A Minnesota restaurant owner has been sentenced to 30 years in federal prison for his role in a massive fraud scheme that stole millions of dollars from a government-funded child nutrition program during the COVID-19 pandemic.Salim Said, the operator...
Thai National Sentenced, Faces Deportation for Operating Immigration Fraud Scheme
Nimon Naphaeng, 36, a native and citizen of Thailand, who resided in Wakefield, R.I., was sentenced Monday to 27 months in federal prison for running an immigration fraud scheme that defrauded more than 320 individuals, most of them immigrants, of at least $400,000, and perhaps more than $518,000.
The scheme included the unauthorized filing of false asylum applications on behalf of individuals who did not request, nor authorize, the applications.
“U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services does not tolerate immigration fraud of any kind,” said Susan Raufer, director of the USCIS Newark Asylum Office. “We are proud of our role in uncovering this fraud scheme and bringing the perpetrator to justice.”
At sentencing, U.S. District Court Chief Judge William E. Smith ordered a provisional amount of restitution of $400,000. The final amount of restitution will be determined subject to additional victims being identified and additional court filings over the next 90 days. According to court documents already filed by the government, restitution in this matter may exceed $518,300. During the investigation, the government seized $285,789.31 from Naphaeng. The forfeited funds will be applied toward restitution for victims of Naphaeng’s crimes.
